Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Diary of a Mad Women - Lilly Collette

While social media, and new age journalism provide many "new" avenues of expressing one's displeasure with life's rotten deals, sometimes people go loopy.

And so is the sad case of Lilly Collette.



Lilly is a regular poster on the Charleston Post and Courier on-line edition, who spends most of her time ranting about how she and her husband were wronged during a child support hearing 20 years ago.

A case that due to South Carolina's child support laws continues to cause considerable hardship to Lilly and her family.

While I don't doubt Lilly's claims her methods leave little doubt that she is several fries short of a happy meal.

In Lilly's own words:

"I have been speaking out against issues of public corruption in the Charleston County family court for years now. I have focused on a case involving my husband as a victim of that corruption—because I am qualified to testify on those facts through first-hand personal experience.

I have not had to use or rely on exaggerated personal opinions—because my stand is firmly based on documented evidence and facts found in public records.

I have not had to re-interpret or re-argue established law—because every shred of law pertinent to the case issues stands in favor of my husband and me.

I do not owe or offer any apologies that the ‘evidence’, ‘facts’ and ‘law’ stand in our favor.

The people that have profited from the crimes against my husband and me and their minion’s have mocked and ridiculed me for defending my husband and daring to speak out against this criminal enterprise. While that was the risk I took when I stood up and fought back, no public official has had the courage to stand with me—not a single one.

I offer thanks to God alone that as a disabled old woman I still have the strength through his grace to stand up for what is right.

Where others stand is not my burden to bear. "

I know you hear the Twilight Zone theme music.

But there's more if you care to wade through this nonsense you'll find that Lilly's husband was married years ago to Susan, they divorced and somehow, its not clear but Richard was deemed a non custodial parent and required to pay child support.

He didn't and years later the courts caught up with him. He was jailed and his social security wages garnished.

Hummmmm or something like that.

Below is more crazyness from Lilly. Read if you dare, and maybe you can help this poor woman before her brain explodes? My sincerest hope is that someone in the legal community will read this and say "hey she just needs _________" and file whatever motion needs to be filled to fix this mess.

For more oddness read the court brief Lilly tried to file here.

After months of crazy comments, Cedar has tired of Lilly's multiple personalities and so I have closed the comments. It's my show and I'll do what I want. But you can always find Ms. Lilly over at the Post and Courier waving her arms and ranting about whatever.

84 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey, I know Lilly. I've been to her home. I know her case and she is absolutly right about the corruption in our family courts. In my case I was broke, jailed and tortured for three days. I spent two of the days in hypothermic coma and almost died. I was disabled and Judge Grafinkel thew me in jail without a hearing. Judge Cate told me I had no consitutional rights three times. It's right in the transcript. A federal lawsuit has been in progress for those that want to look it up. 02:08-487-PMD-RSC. Leave Lilly alone, she is more right than you could know.

Anonymous said...

Which is why Cedar seems to be running with this story.

CP has done some serious work "outing" dirtbags like your Judge Cate.

The more people who comment the more this story will get out.

Anonymous said...

I know Lilly Collette and she's "Loney Tunes" Cedar Posts this woman is wacko!

Run!

Anonymous said...

Hey one question, after reading all of the postings Lilly has made, and she claims to be defending corruption in family courts and standing up for family rights, she never makes mention of her own children. Should you be trusting the words of a woman who CHOOSES to have nothing to do with her own? And this is coming from a daughter she did not raise at all who grew up in another state and did not meet Lilly till she was 20. Point being I dont think she has the right to criticize anyone and we should all just stop and look at ourselves first.

Anonymous said...

YOU GO SISTA! I LOVE YOU GIRL, AND IF LILLIAN DID ANYTHING RIGHT IN HER SAD PATHETIC LIFE IT WAS GIVING ME AN OLDER SISTER TO VENT TO.

Anonymous said...

I am searching for a current address on one Mrs. Charles E. Spires
/A/K/A/ Amy Lynn Turner Spires of South Carolina.
Mrs. Spires /D/O/B/ 5 April 1971. If anyone has this information just post it on this page.

Anonymous said...

I'll get to you later Helen Margaret DeVasto Lourenco.

Anonymous said...

I guess the truth is a hurtful thing huh? And I do not take lightly to being threatened to either so I would keep that in mind and leave it be.

Anonymous said...

If one perceives themselves to be threatened, surely one knows they have a right to file a complaint with a magistrate and have a restraining order issued. It would be far better than publicly engaging in dysfunctional acts of slander / libel which could only serve to discredit the one who instigated the issue.

Anonymous said...

Oh Lillian, you remembered my birthday.I'm flattered.
You know exactly what my address is and how to find me as well. you just elected to stay away.
I know you're PISSED, but you should be careful putting info out that could affect my child, like my address, you old fruit! It may bite you in the end.
sincerely,
Amy L Spires

helen said...

Yes dear I am well aware of this, but when one says i'll get you later, that statement has spoken for itself, in my post I in no way made any false statements towards you as you are well aware. also I am available today feel free to email.

Anonymous said...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100119172751.htm

Anonymous said...

I have zero tolerance for fools and liars who needlessly provoke me -- and I am childless by choice.
Live with it.

Anonymous said...

well in response to your last post, I am not a liar or a fool. A birth certificate is a funny thing, did you know they actually list your parents on it, surely you can not forget being at the Chelsea Naval Hospital could you? Fool Me no I am well aware I have never ever been a first second or third thought in your life. And as far as feeling provoked from the original response to the post I made well you may as well feel provoked from a few people, cause from what I have read I am not the only one to ever respond to one of your posts. As I am sure people will always do so.And some of them have got your personality nailed down pretty good from what I gather so no need for calling me a fool or a liar I have always known where I stood with you .And Live with it I have ,and I have had a better life I do not feel I missed out and by the way , childless by choice is someone who choose not to give birth to any children. What your choice was is something entirely and completly different so please be honest with yourself and call it like it is thank you. and by the way no need to respond to this like you said live with it.

Anonymous said...

What a sad commentary that some presumably self-anointed and supposed advocate for Segars-Andrews only has unrelated personal attacks on me to offer, for shame, for shame, for shame.

PS:// I know where you are hiding.

Anonymous said...

Sometimes it’s better to just delete what has been said and quit all the pointlessly unfounded attacks

Discretion is the better part of valor ...

Anonymous said...

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/feb/02/league-rallies-behind-judge/

League rallies behind judge
__________

Constance Anastopoulo of The League of Women Voters had previously applied for a seat on the Charleston County family court bench—and was turned down.

I had spoken with her (Anastopoulo) several years back about corruption in the Charleston County family court and -- specifically addressed the issues I had with Segars-Andrews committing Social Security Fraud against my husband. She, like every other lawyer I had approached in town, refused to touch the case.

I don't think it would be too far fetched to presume that Anastapoulo may have a personal axe to grind with the legislature.

It's a shame that the League of Women Voters has allowed themselves to be drawn into this pile of poop.

Anonymous said...

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/feb/08/sc-losing-other-states/
(In the matter of Distribution ...)

http://www.easterndistributioninc.com/index.html
Eastern Distribution, a Southeastern Full Service Warehouse Management and Distribution Company.
EASTERN Distribution Is a Woman Minority Owned Business—AND WHAT WOMAN WOULD THAT BE?

http://www.sccourts.org/familyCourt/displayFCjudge.cfm?judgeid=4092
E. H. Segars, Jr, deceased, formerly the CEO and owner of Eastern Distribution, Inc. of Greenville, S. C. […]

It looks like 'Chuckie' is in the distribution business while she also maintained a seat on the family court bench.

Does that seem inappropriate to anyone but me???

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/local/story/1072935.html

http://www.thestate.com/local/story/1072935.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=690470#Comments_Container
lillycollette wrote on 02/11/2010 08:17:02 AM:
The American Civil Liberties Union should be coming to the aid and defense of the legions of family court 'victims'!

Instead we have the insult of Greenwood (ACLU) lawyer C. Rauch Wise speaking out on behalf of the criminal who has harmed innocent victims!

And lawyers dare to wonder why people hate them ...

Anonymous said...

Amy Lynn (Turner) Spires and 'sista',

See:

http://drphil.com/

http://www.drphil.com/plugger/respond/?plugID=13795
Has the worst thing that could ever happen to your child come true? Has your child ever been kidnapped? Accused of a crime? Have you been falsely accused of hurting your child and can't get past the embarrassment? Do you struggle to keep it together as a parent and be strong for your child when you are really breaking down inside? Write in and tell us about it.

http://www.drphil.com/shows/page/chirban/
(survey)

'Ladies' take responsibility for your behavior and get help.

Anonymous said...

I thank you cedarposts. I didn't think anyone else had noticed what a head case this woman is. It does no use to comment on any story even worth posting a comment to on the P&C as she comes right behind and adds any variety of nasty self serving drivel. Do not give her a forum because as evidenced on your blog she will non stop post her crap.

Anonymous said...

To Amy Lynn (Turner) Spires / ‘sista’:
You make it appear that you and cedarposts are having conversations about my mental health. That is an unmeritorious personal opinion not worthy of my attention. More to the point, shouldn’t you be looking at how some people have viewed what you have had to say? Your post of 8 January 2010 was not at all warmly received by other readers.
See: http://www.topix.com/forum/city/greenville-sc/T9AV0ERPALISKND4U
I do not need your permission or that of princess blockhead to post comments on any public forum. If you don’t like what I have to say then don’t read it, don’t comment on it. You were the one who started this. There’s not much princess can do about what I have to say either, well he could delete this page but that would be sort of *itchy of him.

(Mirror mirror on the wall you are Sarah Virginia after all.)

Anonymous said...

PS://
Don't be afraid to get in touch with Dr. Phil. He will be kind to you and your ilk.

Anonymous said...

Everything posted by CedarPost on this page is clearly a personal attack on Lilly Collette.

One person steps forward in defense of Lilly Collette on 15 Dec. 2009 6:40 PM and by 7:02 PM CedarPost has posted the retort:
“Which is why Cedar seems to be running with this story. CP has done some serious work “outing” dirtbags like your Judge Cate. The more people who comment the more this story will get out.”

CedarPost addresses Judge Cate as a “dirtbag” and alleges that he has done some serious work “outing” such dirtbags. There is not one shred of evidence found anywhere on the internet to support that claim. There is nothing on this page to support that claim. All CedarPost has obviously done is personally attack Lilly and call Judge Cate a dirtbag.

The only comments that CP can solicit against Lilly Collette are from two who acknowledge they have been disowned and disinherited by her. It is of little wonder here why they were disowned and disinherited.

Good for Lilly Collette.

Anonymous said...

I don't see where Cedar calls Judge Cate a dirt bag.

Where should I look?

I also don't see anywhere that this is a personal attack.

Please back up your claims about CP.

All I see is a nutty woman that should be commited to the nut house.

Anonymous said...

You 'folks' are obviously mouth-pieces for that 'Chuckie' Segars-Andrews sick-o.

You don’t see where Cedar calls Judge Cate a dirt bag?

Are you blind drunk / drugged / illiterate / stupid / completely psychotically delusional / all of the above???

Look at December 15, 2009 7:02 PM: CP has done some serious work "outing" dirtbags like your Judge Cate.
See DIRTBAGS now … you freak.

You said, I also don't see anywhere that this is a personal attack. Please back up your claims about CP. All I see is a nutty woman that should be commited to the nut house.

The very opening of this page starts out with false allegations that Lilly Collette has lost her mind.

One person speaks up on her behalf and this CP thing solicits psychotic attacks from people claiming to be daughters of Lilly—but you don’t see where there have been any personal attacks … amazing!

If you want to quit seeing a nutty person who needs to be committed to the nut house,

MOVE AWAY FROM YOUR MIRROR STUPID.

Anonymous said...

“Please back up your claims about CP.”

The things against CP are right under your nose. What … you blinded by the snow on / up your nose.

Anonymous said...

Happy Valentine’s Day—and most sincere sympathies to Deborah from Lilly.

Anonymous said...

lillian, apparently there is a bit of confusion. my last posting was on jan,26, and my sisters was on the 21st. as I mentioned I am not the only person to ever respond to any of your postings and clearly this is the case, I have found you unworthy of responding to so who ever is responding is not my sister or me but more power to them and I commend them for their rights to freedom of speech and sharing their opinions as they are well within their bounds to do so. Me and my family are very well adjusted and are better off without you and have always been. so af far as any further postings do not assume they are from us, you know what the say about a person who assumes don't you? I can assure you if it is from me I will leave my name at the bottom. thank you Helen ps..

I am not hiding I am right where you left me 43 yrs ago.

Anonymous said...

Please call the men in the white coats!

Anonymous said...

Hi all, I do agree all the postings lately do seem rather unproductive, but I can assure you my claim to being the daughter of lilly is not a fabrication. if anyone would like to contact me directly feel free to do so at zaleslady@gmail.com and I can try to do the best I can to respond.I would really encourage all to continue to use their right to free speech and continue posting whatever it may be , everyone has a right to be heard whatever their view may be on any subject, that is what makes this country great. we have alot of freedoms here others do not have and to me freedom of speech is one of the greatest we have. Not everyone has to agree with opinions that are out there but we are all entitled to our own and that is fine. I do not know much about the politics of the area there but I do plan on getting to know more about them as I do plan on in a few years in making the south a permanent residence. I visit every year and enjoy everything the south has to offer. have a wonderful week to all. Helen

Anonymous said...

The no-brainer comments against Lilly Collette are plainly attacks on her credibility posted by unethical / immoral supports of Segars-Andrews who obviously suffer from unresolved juvenile issues.

See, http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/judgeandrews

# 1298:
Jan 11, 2010, Amy Spires, South Carolina
AMY LYNN SPIRES, THE YOUNGEST DAUGHTER OF LILLIAN COBURN SMITH HUNLEY DEVASTO TURNER COLLETTE. WHAT # HUSBAND DOES THIS MAKE?! GOOD LUCK, JUDGE SEGARS-ANDREWS!

Also see, http://www.topix.com/forum/city/greenville-sc/T9AV0ERPALISKND4U
AMY.
OMG, LILLIAN! IS SENILITY TAKING ITS TOLL? DO YOU REMEMBER THE TRAILER PARKS YOU'VE LIVED IN FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS? YOU'VE GOT NERVE CALLING ANDREWS WHITE TRASH. DO YOU HAVE STONE WALLS BUILT AROUND YOUR GLASS PALACE? YOU HAVE NERVE ADVOCATING FOR FAMILY COURT INJUSTICES. DO THE CONFUSED BELIEVERS OF YOUR MASSIVE BALDERDASH HAVE ANY IDEA OF THE 3 PREVIOUS HUSBANDS AND 3 PREVIOUS CHILDREN YOU'VE DISPOSED OF? YOU KNOW FULL GOOD AND WELL THAT 20 YEARS AGO YOU WERE RUNNING MY DAD THROUGH THE FAMILY COURT RINGER AND HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF RICHARD COLLETTE. WHY ARE YOU BEATING A DEAD HORSE OVER SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED BEFORE YOU CAME ALONG? I ACCIDENTALLY STUMBLED UPON THE NUMEROUS INSANE PAGES OF YOUR MANIC RAVINGS, AND I'M SO GLAD THAT YOU HAVE DISOWNED ME(AS IS MY SISTER, AND YOUR THROAT SLASHING SON. GET A BETTER HOBBY, MIMMY DEAREST!.... YOUR YOUNGEST, AMY
Judged:
6 disagreed, 5 judged it mean, 4 judged it incindiary.

Lilly Collette has presented irrefutable evidence to support her charges of public corruption in a number of venues.

Her detractors have nothing to offer except defamation, libel and slander. It is of little wonder here why she does not wish to be bothered by her alleged children.

Anonymous said...

try using an updated picture we all know that picture is twenty years old

Anonymous said...

I have known Lilly Collette since 1992. I see or speak to her on a daily basis. Anyone who knows Lilly is well aware that she is a very sane and extraordinary woman. From what I have read, the people who are attacking her have not seen or spoken to her in many, many years. Which leaves me to believe, your postings are nothing but your mental condition showing?

Is this site solely to attack Lilly?
For some very strange reason, I was led to believe that it was set up to discuss problems with our court system.

What's going on here? Are the posters so bored with their lives that they have nothing else to do, but spread vicious unfounded rumors?
JWB

Anonymous said...

Well if you have known her since 92 then you of all people should be aware that she had given birth to three children, the fact that she chooses to have nothing to do with them (us) is really not an issue for me, all I have had wondered about is why a woman who has such poor family values would put herself in the state she has. a person of strong moral character strong family values that is a person who I would look to for advice in forum as such, I do have a right to post opinions as do others instead she has her panties in a bunch not because I have responded but becase I responded allowing people to kmow alittle more about her moral character which is fact, I have never offered to call her a name as she has me. and if she does not like the fact that her other daughter has signed the petition to keep andrews well, alot of others have signed as well. she responds with viciousness and doesn't expect a response? Neither of us had anything posted for a month untill yesterday. Apparently she seems to have the need to keep feeding into what should have been let rest so if you want to know you will have to ask her. Not every one has to agree with her opinion but I do have the right to read it and if she doesnt want it read I dont know what to tell her,And I am not looking for her to take a mommy role either, I have one in the state she left me in . they have been very good to me love me and have given me more than she ever could have. so there is no need for her to be calling me princess blockhead anymore I have not stooped to her level , but thats what her personality is capable of childish antics. accept responsibility for our own actions is all I ask of her. not to much I think. not to be to harsh on you. I understand she is your friend , and good luck with that.

Anonymous said...

I became, shall we say, "interested" in Ms Collette after reading her inane and nonsensical ramblings and postings on the Post and Couriers website. Googling her was quite a treat and that Facebook picture was the icing on the cake! I truly was curious to see if she had any credibility after seeing her hate filled posts about the young man she calls "the Asian Bastard". That kid never harmed her and she tries to post a picture of him to her profile? And to call your biological off spring names like "Princess Blockhead" made my jaw drop! Nice going there Lilly Collette, you just keep digging the crazy hole a little deeper every day. Thanks for the entertainment, it breaks up a dull work day!

Anonymous said...

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:24 PM
Amy Lynn (Turner) Spires and Helen Margaret (DeVasto) Lourenco owe me (Lilly Collette) a sincere public apology for stalking and harassing me and a written guarantee that they will cease and desist from all further contact after they have published their apologies.

Anonymous said...

Would someone please shut the nut case's pie hole for her.

I understand civil committment papers can be filed by anyone. A couple of days later the white coats and cops show up and take her away.

It will be at least a month before she gets a hearing and maybe they will keep her.


Muhahahaha!

Anonymous said...

IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE COMMENTS YOUR BLOG GETS SHUT IT DOWN.

Anonymous said...

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/mar/03/justices-hear-segars-andrews-case/
Justices hear Segars-Andrews case


"Muhahahaha!"

Anonymous said...

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/mar/03/justices-hear-segars-andrews-case/
Justices hear Segars-Andrews case


"Muhahahaha!"

Anonymous said...

lillycollette wrote:

OMG—shame on Derfner for the frivolous rambling fantasies he presented as legal arguments!

He felt that the JMSC was invading / usurping the authority of the judiciary by finding ‘Chuckie’ unqualified after the Appellate Court had upheld her decision in the Simpson case.

He also felt the JMSC was usurping authority from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) in finding her unqualified after the ODC —allegedly— found she had done no wrong in the Simpson case.

Derfner has a duty to know and therefore does know the JMSC is a constitutionally established commission that has nine statutory evaluative criteria upon which to base their findings of the qualifications of any judicial applicant—none of which grant the JMSC the authority to defer their responsibilities to the App. Ct. or the ODC.

He —alleged— that the JMSC was unconstitutional because of the number of legislators serving on the JMSC.

And worst of all he —alleged— the Simpson case was the only case against the long outstanding judicial career of ‘Chuckie’.

He went to lengths to portray the Simpson’s as disgruntled litigants who held extraordinary sway with the JMSC—when the only ‘disgruntled litigant’ in this entire affair is ‘Chuckie’ Segars-Andrews!

SHAME ON YOU DERFNER!!!
3/3/2010 7:16 AM EST on Post and Courier
==============================================================
lillycollette wrote:

"Aren't judges sidestepping questions now that may be political hot potatoes?" asked Justice Kaye Hearn at one point.

In response to Kaye's question:
If so then they need to step forward so that they too can be replaced.
3/3/2010 7:24 AM EST on Post and Courier

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/03/03/1183311/supreme-court-hears-judicial-independence.html

lillycollette wrote on 03/04/2010 07:01:04 AM:

“Segars-Andrews -- says -- it’s inappropriate for lawmakers to dominate the committee and then vote in judicial elections.”

Lilly Collette -- says -- that Segars-Andrews has fraudulently occupied her position on that bench since February 2002 when she knowingly engaged in Social Security Fraud and therein became a criminal and a trespasser to the bench.

As a consequence of her criminal violations of law Segars-Andrews would have had no standing to bring this action against the Judicial Merits Selection Commission.

Anonymous said...

Cedar Post will lose everything he has worked hard to acquire.

Jail will change him.

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/03/10/1194171/dss-case-5-million-fraud-keeps.html
DSS case: $5 million fraud keeps going and growing

lillycollette wrote on 03/11/2010 05:58:00 AM:
Given my personal experience I doubt Johnny Gasser’s estimation that this case literally dropped into the laps of the investigators—more like shoved up their … nose. I do appreciate them ‘finally’ becoming interested in where the Medicaid money was going.

NOW IF I COULD JUST GET ONE OF THEM TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHERE SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY INCOME IS GOING—BEFORE IT GETS INTO THE MILLION DOLLAR MARK LIKE THIS MEDICAID FRAUD!!!

Anonymous said...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vincent-Sheheen/156567855552?ref=ts#!/pages/Vincent-Sheheen/156567855552?v=feed&story_fbid=352349963868
Vincent Sheheen Thanks to the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce for their endorsement! I'm honored to have their support. As governor, my number one priority will be job creation and getting our economy moving again. I will personally lead the state’s efforts to recruit robust industry and aggressively pursue economic development opportunities for South Carolina.

Lilly Collette:
What good will bringing jobs and prosperity into this state do when the people are at risk of being hit by the runaway train of public corruption in the family court system where they can be stripped of everything they ever owned or hoped to own—including all constitutional rights?

I am interested in public accountability and transparency in the judiciary specifically in the family court system.
Is Vincent interested in cleaning out this criminal cartel?

Anonymous said...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051002115557.htm
Oct. 2, 2005
First Evidence of Brain Abnormalities Found In Pathological Liars
[…] "Pathological liars can't always tell truth from falsehood and contradict themselves in an interview. They are manipulative and they admit they prey on people. […] in business, they could assist in pre-employment screening, working out which individuals may not be suitable for hiring.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060724003925.htm
July 24, 2006
So who are psychopaths? Broadly speaking, they are people who use manipulation, violence and intimidation to control others and satisfy selfish needs. They can be intelligent and highly charismatic, but display a chronic inability to feel guilt, remorse or anxiety about any of their actions. […] Surprisingly, many who fall into that bracket might lead perfectly conventional lives as doctors, scientists and company CEOs.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090503203738.htm
May 5, 2009

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090804090946.htm
Aug. 5, 2009

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100314150924.htm
Mar. 15, 2010

Anonymous said...

Lilly S. Collette: The 270 / 365 day rule:

The White female, Susan Lee Rice, three months pregnant by an Asian male, forged the name of a (disabled) White male, Richard S. Collette, to a marriage license.

Susan was assisted in this forgery and fraud by Probate court judge Shelton Parker.

Six months after Susan’s marriage license forgery she delivered a full term fully Asian featured boy. Falsely alleging herself to be Susan R. Collette she then filed for a divorce from Richard.

Case file number 87-DR-10-0294 shows that no temporary orders had been issued.

What is purported and captioned to be the “FINAL ORDER” in this case plainly shows that no hearing on the merits had ever occurred. Absolutely none of Susan’s false allegations were raised to the court for a ruling.

Without the exercise of any judicial discretion at all the court accepted Susan’s verbal allegations that Richard had agreed to sign over his interest in his home to Susan and to directly pay her $200.00 dollars per month for the support of her child.

Susan was assisted in this fraud by family court judge Bernard J. Warshauser and attorney Lon Shull.

Richard S. Collette was knowingly maliciously prosecuted for years by Susan and the family court until her still illegitimate son aged out.

So much for the 270 / 365 day rule.

Anonymous said...

whine support. whine whine. A bit of offerings here, Age of emancipation/age of maturity in S.C.
Age of emancipation in S.C. is 18 or if the child is still in high school it is 19 untill graduation,, whichever comes first. Support is not automatically terminated, a court order is necessary to terminate support. (SC code 20-7-420(17)) next bit of offerings here South Carolina Statue of limitations on back child support payments(arrears) Enforcement of past due child support in S.C. is not subject to statue of limitations. well I just thought I should share this. hahahaha

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
helen said...

who ever placed last post is in clear violation of abuse you may not place any persons personal information here, it has been reported, and I am looking in to possibility of tracking sender. thank you Helen lourenco. p.s. there was also no reason to do such a thing my sister has not gone near this site , again if I am needed I can be reached at zaleslady@gmail.com (public displays aren't necessary, and I thought you would appreciate the information on child support.)I also have some correct information on marriage licenses , common law marriages etc I would be happy to share with you if you need correct information let me know, again this is Helen Lourenco thanks and have a great night

Cedar Posts, Life Floating By and Meckburbia said...

So what is it that Lilly Collette is saying, it is very hard to follow or make sense of, or is that the joke?

Anonymous said...

http://gaveltogavel.us/site/about/

http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/08/judicial-removal-week-2010/

http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/09/judicial-removal-week-marital-master-michael-garner-nh/

http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/08/judicial-removal-week-judge-thomas-bartheld-ok/

Anonymous said...

“Under South Carolina law, a defendant may be estopped from claiming the statute of limitations as a defense if the delay that otherwise would give operation to the statute ha[s] been induced by the defendant's conduct.” Kleckley v. N.W. Nat. Cas. Co., 338 S.C. 131, 136, 526 S.E.2d 218, 220 (2000)(internal quotation omitted).

Anonymous said...

LMAO:

http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/whatsnew/displayWhatsNew.cfm?indexId=646

Frances P. Segars-Andrews v.
Judicial Merit Selection Commission

Opinion No. 26791
Heard March 2, 2010 - Filed March 23, 2010

COMPLAINT DISMISSED

MUHAHAHAHA!

Anonymous said...

LMAO:

http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/whatsnew/displayWhatsNew.cfm?indexId=646

Frances P. Segars-Andrews v.
Judicial Merit Selection Commission

Opinion No. 26791
Heard March 2, 2010 - Filed March 23, 2010

COMPLAINT DISMISSED

MUHAHAHAHA!

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/03/24/1213837/sc-justices-rule-against-judge.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=3916110#Comments_Container

lillycollette wrote on 03/25/2010 08:04:18 AM:
I do find the term “Disgruntled Litigant” to be offensive and disingenuous in the extreme.

It is the current branding iron used by a corrupt legal system to mark a particular group—mostly victims who have the courage to speak out against corruption.

“Disgruntled Litigant” has become the new “N*****” word instituted by members of the bar association to blow-off their victims. Keeping all that in mind …

The only persons I could recognize passing for disgruntled litigants in this case and story are Frances P. Segars-Andrews (Chuckie), Armand Derfner and Robert Rosen.

If they do not comprehend that they speaking out against "HIGHER STANDARDS" for the judiciary, then they are beyond any help I could offer—if I were so disposed.

Anonymous said...

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/mar/27/system-to-track-sc-deadbeats/?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:89c1ab46-b472-405d-a180-fc04aa1a319c#CommentKey:89c1ab46-b472-405d-a180-fc04aa1a319c

You can't order child support without establishing paternity. This article plainly states that paternity was only established in 89% of the cases.

Anonymous said...

The arrest warrants for the person listed at the very top of this page have been drafted and prepared for the signature of a federal magistrate.

They sit in a folder awaiting the word.

Anonymous said...

An arrest warrant for Silly Lilly?

How can that be?

Christina Calmes said...

Dear anonymous, unless someone died and MADE YOU GOD, it is none of your business what or why Lilly does with her children! The so called "FAMILY" court and DSS is in fact corrupt and has been for as long as it has been in place! So if "THEY" are typing up arrest warrants now for freedom of speach {which wouldnt surprise me one bit} then THEY had best get busy typing out one for me too!!! At least Lilly and I have the cohones to PUT our names on what we write thankyou very much!!!

Anonymous said...

Christina, the comment said: “The arrest warrants for the person listed at the very top of this page have been drafted and prepared for the signature of a federal magistrate. They sit in a folder awaiting the word.”

I think that cedarposts is the one making threats of arrest. HOWEVER, the looser failed to notice that the name listed at the very top of this page is -- “cedarposts”.

If 'princess blockhead' wishes to go talk to Robert Carr about having himself arrested that’s cool with me. All I can say is “WORD”.

Hey cedarposts, Lilly says: WORD, WORD, WORD.

Anonymous said...

And Helen you really need to work on your reading comprehension. I never addressed you as princess blockhead--because that is what I call cedarposts.

Anonymous said...

I had one heck of a time trying to figure out why anyone would be so catty about my choice of photographs on facebook:
“try using an updated picture we all know that picture is twenty years old.”, and, “Googling her was quite a treat and that Facebook picture was the icing on the cake!”

Then I googled:
Helen Lourenco
http://www.myspace.com/helencfishing

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewAlbums&friendID=379230878

Ooooh mmmmy … Now I see why some people would be upset over my picture…

Bad news it's not twenty years old.

Anonymous said...

do you really not have a life?

Anonymous said...

So -- if I make the time to address the shameful crackpot abuse being dished out by cedarposts (/a/k/a/ princess blockhead) -- and those two women who were disowned and disinherited -- then in your (anonymous) estimation I may not really have a life.

The ‘only reason’ I am in the public eye is because I refuse to accept the abusive criminal misconduct dished out by the family court.

It obviously rankles some that I do have a life and the courage to stand up against abusers.

Given this blog of cedarposts’ perhaps your question would be better presented to him:
“do you really not have a life?”

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/03/31/1223058/end-legislatures-stranglehold.html

Opinion:
End Legislature's stranglehold on judiciary

Respose:
END THE CORRUPT FAMILY COURT STRANGLEHOLD ON INNOCENT VICTIMS

(How ya like me now Chuckie?)

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/03/30/1221775/scoppe-judicial-restraint-over.html
Scoppe: Judicial restraint over judicial independence
By CINDI ROSS SCOPPE - Associate Editor

Quote: […] there simply was no room to side with the wronged judge who brought the suit. She is being robbed of her seat because a handful of legislators didn't like a decision she made; […]

Response: There was no ‘wronged’ judge in this case and she did not 'own' that seat to have been robbed of it!

Anonymous said...

I am a near middle aged Handicapped woman (Yes I also have Charcot Marie Tooth) It does not make life easy but it is not the worst thing to happen, point being dear, I have a Job I work I am not a drain on our already over burdened system, I also have another group I sit on I do help out with so I do my part to help out with social injustices that make immediate impact, I was actually voted in and not self appointed, (feels good) so I do not have all day to bad mouth and call people names, that is not standing up for anything , speaking a loud opinion in your special way that has given many such entertainment,really does not help anything, so get a hobby join a committee consider a part time time job some where you might be happier after doing so, it will give your life meaning and purpose. There is also nothing wrong with my comprehension but your writing skills and research skills, well, and please for the last time, (I did not have to repeat myself this much with my children when I was raising BOTH of them) public displays are not needed I have an email I have left out in plain eye sight, you know I have your add, with the exception of last year I have sent a christmas card Its ok you never sent one back , didn't expect it. (so I decided to stop sending them) So If you have any comments use email not public eye I know u need an audience but you can stop now. thank you helen

Anonymous said...

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

SC SUPREME COURT RULES: NO SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO APPOINTED COUNSEL FOR INDIGENTS IN NONSUPPORT CIVIL CONTEMPT CASES

Frankly, we are surprised with the decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court in the Case of Price v. Turner. We think that the argument advanced by the A. C. L. U. in its Amici Curiae Brief is more legally and logically sound than the Court's reasoning in Price. We also think that it is intellectually dishonest to pretend that (a). these cattle call Rule Hearings contain any semblance of Due Process; (b.) only wilful contemnors are ever incarcerated;* and, (c.) any objective observer would conclude that even the majority of these "Deadbeats" possess "the keys to their own jail cells."

Unfortunately, we suspect that the South Carolina Supreme Court had no other choice than to rule this way given, as noted in "South Carolina Statehouse Report," that South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal is essentially having to beg the General Assembly for funding and that she has already gone on record as wanting all fines and fees generated through the Courts to fund the Courts.


It goes without saying that if more people had lawyers, fewer would go to jail for contempt and the Courts would receive fewer fines and fees. So there may be an inherent conflict of interest in the South Carolina Supreme Court deciding this case on the facts of this case. Still, the bigger question is whether incarcerating indigents for non-support is going to "solve for pattern." By definition, indigents do not have money, income, and assets to meet their financial obligations. Therefore, incarcerating them for a year does not create wealth, but only transfers the burden of providing food, clothing, shelter--and sometimes very expensive medical care--for the indigent "Deadbeats" from their backs to that of the taxpayers.


It may be viscerally satisfying to some individuals to see the county jails chock full of indigent "Deadbeats," however, creating Debtor's Prisons, regardless of what you call them, is still--in our view--bad public policy. But good policy or not, given the state of the economy and South Carolina's recent commitment to track down and crack down on "Deadbeats," we anticipate that the jails will soon be bursting at the seams with indigent contemnors to a point that there will be no space left for either convicts or criminals. Where to place those folks will present a whole new challenge.


*According to a piece by Charleston County attorney Gregory S. Forman, Esquire:
Almost every state in the Southeast had determined that it is improper to hold a delinquent parent in jail if he or she lacks the capacity to pay the full amount owed. Ex parte Rojo, 925 S.W.2d 654 (Tex. 1996); Ex parte Talbert, 419 So. 2d 240, 241 (Ala. Civ. App. 1982); In Re Nichols, 749 So. 2d 68 (Miss. 1999); McMiller v. McMiller, 77 N.C.App. 436, 335 S.E.2d 187 (1985); Lee v. Lee, 78 N.C. App. 632, 337 S.E.2d 690 (1985); Lynch v. Lynch, 342 Md. 509, 677 A.2d 584 (1996).

Anonymous said...

http://citizensforethics.org/
Want to join CREW's crew?

Anonymous said...

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2010/01/07/the-loss-of-the-right-to-a-trial-by-jury-child-support-and-divorce-cases-in-america/

The Loss of the Right to a Trial by Jury: Child Support and Divorce Cases in America
By Mark Cimini

Anonymous said...

http://www.ricoact.com/ricoact/theact.asp#top

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (1994)


Sec. 1961. Definitions

Sec. 1962. Prohibited activities

Sec. 1963. Criminal penalties

Sec. 1964. Civil remedies

Sec. 1965. Venue and process

Sec. 1966. Expedition of actions

Sec. 1967. Evidence

Sec. 1968. Civil investigative demand

Anonymous said...

http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usab5206.pdf

Social Security Fraud

Anonymous said...

google: fraud

Cedar Posts said...

Whoa! This has got way out of hand, so after today Cedar Posts will close the comments for this story.

Then later next week we are going to post a follow-up to Lilly Collette.

We'll explore her criminal record judgements, credit scores and mental health.

Thanks to all who have emailed cedarposts with your facts and lies about Lilly, it has been a mess to sort through.

By the way need think the photos are great.

Anonymous said...

I hope the poor woman gets help, it is clear her family is not helping her.

Anonymous said...

Big bad Cedarposts expressly set this page up to bully and denigrate Lilly.

Big man even had to have two ‘women’ back him up—two women who publicly acknowledged that Lilly had disowned and disinherited them and they have had no contact with her for years.

Lilly has consistently given public warning that she doesn’t tolerate liars and fools—yet these three kept hammering away.

Now princess blockhead (cedarposts) is threatening to post a follow-up on Lilly where he will “explore her criminal record judgments, credit scores and mental health”.

Wow what a princess!
Wow what an -- imagination -- you girls have.

Lilly.

Anonymous said...

Cedarposts said: “By the way need think the photos are great.”

If one needs reassurance from cedarposts about their looks one would be better off investing in a makeover.

Anonymous said...

Is this an April Fool's Joke?

Anonymous said...

Be advised:
Lilly frequently laughs.
Lilly never jokes.

Anonymous said...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/04/01/1225174/state-representative-arrested.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=905840#Comments_Container

Hey (!!!) what about that Jack Landis character being elected to the family court bench with four tax liens against him totaling 27 thousand dollars?

MUHAHAHAHA

Anonymous said...

Cedarposts is a troll (hobgoblin, bad fairy) that lurks the internet seeking to create slanderous scenarios to disparage and denigrate victims of crime for his personal entertainment.
What a guy!!!

Judy Lee Reynolds said...

The hearing for the involuntary commitment of Lilly Collette has been set, those family members concerned have been informed of the date and time.

Small place as last time.

Please, we all ask for your prayers for Ms Collette at this time and hope that the State of SC will listen to the medical professional.